Caravonica vs Holloways Beach, QLD Suburb Comparison

Caravonica for families and value; Holloways Beach for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

CaravonicaHolloways Beach

Overall score

Caravonica

47.1/100

Holloways Beach

50.6/100

Crime rate

Caravonica

83.1 / 1k

Holloways Beach

83.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Caravonica

51

Holloways Beach

344

Population

Caravonica

2,183

Holloways Beach

2,398

Metric leadCaravonica 2Holloways Beach 63 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryCaravonicaHolloways Beach
Overall score47.1/10050.6/100
Housing (desirability)65.8/10068.7/100
Crime rate83.1 / 1k83.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools11
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves39
Walkability4.5/10047.5/100
Nearby amenities51344
Green cover54.3%26.0%
Population2,1832,398
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Caravonica is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Holloways Beach is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace.

Caravonica pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and overall desirability, whereas Holloways Beach is the better pick for parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Caravonica sits in a well priced band, compared with a affordable feel in Holloways Beach.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Caravonica, while Holloways Beach remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons