Aeroglen vs Holloways Beach, QLD Suburb Comparison

Aeroglen for families and beach lifestyle; Holloways Beach for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AeroglenHolloways Beach

Overall score

Aeroglen

48.0/100

Holloways Beach

50.6/100

Crime rate

Aeroglen

236.4 / 1k

Holloways Beach

83.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Aeroglen

89

Holloways Beach

344

Population

Aeroglen

405

Holloways Beach

2,398

Metric leadAeroglen 1Holloways Beach 81 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAeroglenHolloways Beach
Overall score48.0/10050.6/100
Housing (desirability)44.6/10068.7/100
Crime rate236.4 / 1k83.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)11.8/10011.8/100
Parks & reserves29
Walkability23.0/10047.5/100
Nearby amenities89344
Green cover4.7%26.0%
Population4052,398
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/103/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Aeroglen is a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living, and Holloways Beach is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace. Where Aeroglen is shaped by the coast, Holloways Beach offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.

Aeroglen pulls ahead on housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Holloways Beach is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and walkability. On housing, Aeroglen sits in a gently premium band, compared with a affordable feel in Holloways Beach.

Aeroglen suits retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, investors, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Holloways Beach is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons