Overall score
Fullarton
54.2/100
Kings Park
43.6/100
Fullarton for investment and value; Kings Park for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Fullarton
54.2/100
Kings Park
43.6/100
Crime rate
Fullarton
56.9 / 1k
Kings Park
25.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Fullarton
146
Kings Park
34
Population
Fullarton
4,500
Kings Park
574
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Fullarton | Kings Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.2/100 | 43.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 23.2/100 | 12.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 56.9 / 1k | 25.7 / 1k |
| Public transport stops | 10 | 5 |
| Walkability | 59.0/100 | 24.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 146 | 34 |
| Planning activity | 43 | 5 |
| Population | 4,500 | 574 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Fullarton is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Kings Park is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
On the data, Fullarton is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; Kings Park answers with a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Fullarton if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Kings Park for retirees and families.