Furnissdale vs Stake Hill, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Furnissdale | Stake Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 8.2/100 | 35.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 18.0/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | — |
| Walkability | 19.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 0 |
| Population | 1,061 | 469 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 8/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesStake Hill
- Best for familiesStake Hill
- Best for investmentStake Hill
- Best for best valueStake Hill
Comparison summary
Put side by side, Furnissdale is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Stake Hill is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.
Furnissdale pulls ahead on walkability and nearby cafés and amenities, whereas Stake Hill is the better pick for housing affordability and overall desirability. Furnissdale generally means more approachable housing costs, while Stake Hill leans toward more mid-market housing value.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Stake Hill, while Furnissdale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.