Furnissdale vs Stake Hill, WA Suburb Comparison

Furnissdale for investment; Stake Hill for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FurnissdaleStake Hill

Overall score

Furnissdale

26.5/100

Stake Hill

24.4/100

Crime rate

Furnissdale

59.7 / 1k

Stake Hill

59.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Furnissdale

5

Stake Hill

1

Population

Furnissdale

1,061

Stake Hill

469

Metric leadFurnissdale 5Stake Hill 13 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFurnissdaleStake Hill
Overall score26.5/10024.4/100
Housing (desirability)55.3/10048.3/100
Crime rate59.7 / 1k59.7 / 1k
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Public transport stops13—
Walkability44.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities51
Green cover0.0%0.0%
Population1,061469
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Furnissdale is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Stake Hill is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.

Furnissdale pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, whereas Stake Hill is the better pick for housing affordability, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Furnissdale generally means more approachable housing costs, while Stake Hill leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Stake Hill, while Furnissdale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons