Furnissdale vs Stake Hill, WA suburb comparison

Stake Hill for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

FurnissdaleStake Hill

Overall score

Furnissdale

12.1/100

Stake Hill

30.1/100

Crime rate

Furnissdale

9942.7 / 1k

Stake Hill

26956.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Furnissdale

3

Stake Hill

0

Population

Furnissdale

1,061

Stake Hill

469

Metric leadFurnissdale 4Stake Hill 3across 7 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryFurnissdaleStake Hill
Overall score12.1/10030.1/100
Housing (desirability)18.0/10076.0/100
Crime rate9942.7 / 1k26956.1 / 1k
Public transport stops13
Walkability19.5/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities30
Population1,061469
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)1/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Furnissdale is a settled metro smaller community that keeps everyday living grounded and accessible, and Stake Hill is a settled metro smaller community that balances access with everyday calm.

Furnissdale pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and walkability, whereas Stake Hill is the better pick for housing affordability and overall desirability. Furnissdale generally means more approachable housing costs, while Stake Hill leans toward more mid-market housing value.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Stake Hill, while Furnissdale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons