Overall score
Barragup
20.9/100
Stake Hill
24.4/100
Barragup vs Stake Hill, WA Suburb Comparison
Stake Hill for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
BarragupStake Hill
Crime rate
Barragup
59.7 / 1k
Stake Hill
59.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Barragup
3
Stake Hill
1
Population
Barragup
940
Stake Hill
469
Metric leadBarragup 3Stake Hill 33 tiedacross 9 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for investmentStake Hill
- Best for best valueStake Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Barragup | Stake Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 20.9/100 | 24.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 23.9/100 | 48.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 59.7 / 1k | 59.7 / 1k |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Public transport stops | 7 | — |
| Walkability | 10.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 1 |
| Green cover | 0.0% | 0.0% |
| Population | 940 | 469 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Barragup is a practical metro smaller community with approachable housing and suburban calm, while Stake Hill is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm.
Barragup pulls ahead on walkability, nearby cafés and amenities, and a larger local community, whereas Stake Hill is the better pick for housing affordability, overall desirability, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. On housing, Barragup sits in a affordable band, compared with a gently premium feel in Stake Hill.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Stake Hill, while Barragup remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.