Garden Suburb vs Macquarie Hills, NSW Suburb Comparison

Garden Suburb for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Garden SuburbMacquarie Hills

Overall score

Garden Suburb

52.2/100

Macquarie Hills

43.1/100

Crime rate

Garden Suburb

86.8 / 1k

Macquarie Hills

64.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Garden Suburb

29

Macquarie Hills

42

Population

Garden Suburb

1,959

Macquarie Hills

3,605

Metric leadGarden Suburb 5Macquarie Hills 53 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGarden SuburbMacquarie Hills
Overall score52.2/10043.1/100
Housing (desirability)47.3/10022.1/100
Crime rate86.8 / 1k64.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools114
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops2867
Walkability30.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities2942
Planning activity98
Green cover23.1%6.2%
Population1,9593,605
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/108/10

Comparison summary

Garden Suburb reads as a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm; Macquarie Hills is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Macquarie Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Garden Suburb keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Garden Suburb tends to lead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and overall desirability, while Macquarie Hills stands out for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and nearby cafés and amenities.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Garden Suburb, while Macquarie Hills remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons