Glendale vs Macquarie Hills, NSW suburb comparison

Glendale for families and investment; Macquarie Hills for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GlendaleMacquarie Hills

Overall score

Glendale

62.3/100

Macquarie Hills

45.3/100

Crime rate

Glendale

64.7 / 1k

Macquarie Hills

64.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glendale

143

Macquarie Hills

37

Population

Glendale

3,260

Macquarie Hills

3,605

Metric leadGlendale 6Macquarie Hills 41 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlendaleMacquarie Hills
Overall score62.3/10045.3/100
Housing (desirability)72.6/10045.6/100
Crime rate64.7 / 1k64.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools74
Parks & reserves11
Public transport stops10667
Walkability92.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities14337
Planning activity248
Population3,2603,605
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)3/108/10

Comparison summary

Glendale reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Macquarie Hills is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Macquarie Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Glendale keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Glendale is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Macquarie Hills answers with a calmer planning outlook and a larger local community. Glendale generally means more approachable housing costs, while Macquarie Hills leans toward more sought-after housing.

Glendale suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Macquarie Hills is the stronger match for retirees.

Related comparisons