Overall score
Glendale
62.3/100
Macquarie Hills
45.3/100
Glendale for families and investment; Macquarie Hills for retirees and schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glendale
62.3/100
Macquarie Hills
45.3/100
Crime rate
Glendale
64.7 / 1k
Macquarie Hills
64.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glendale
143
Macquarie Hills
37
Population
Glendale
3,260
Macquarie Hills
3,605
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glendale | Macquarie Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 62.3/100 | 45.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 72.6/100 | 45.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 64.7 / 1k | 64.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 4 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 106 | 67 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 143 | 37 |
| Planning activity | 24 | 8 |
| Population | 3,260 | 3,605 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 3/10 | 8/10 |
Glendale reads as a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Macquarie Hills is a hills mid-sized suburb where tree cover and calm define the mood. Macquarie Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Glendale keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Glendale is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Macquarie Hills answers with a calmer planning outlook and a larger local community. Glendale generally means more approachable housing costs, while Macquarie Hills leans toward more sought-after housing.
Glendale suits families and investors more clearly, whereas Macquarie Hills is the stronger match for retirees.