Geilston Bay vs Lindisfarne, TAS Suburb Comparison

Geilston Bay for investment and value; Lindisfarne for retirees and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Geilston BayLindisfarne

Overall score

Geilston Bay

46.2/100

Lindisfarne

56.9/100

Crime rate

Geilston Bay

55.5 / 1k

Lindisfarne

55.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Geilston Bay

88

Lindisfarne

140

Population

Geilston Bay

3,461

Lindisfarne

6,639

Metric leadGeilston Bay 1Lindisfarne 74 tiedacross 12 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGeilston BayLindisfarne
Overall score46.2/10056.9/100
Housing (desirability)76.9/10059.2/100
Crime rate55.5 / 1k55.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools35
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves44
Public transport stops4043
Walkability30.0/10086.0/100
Nearby amenities88140
Green cover7.9%8.6%
Population3,4616,639
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Geilston Bay is a leafier hillside mid-sized suburb with elevated outlooks, while Lindisfarne is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by. Geilston Bay sits among greener hillside streets, while Lindisfarne keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Geilston Bay is stronger for housing affordability; Lindisfarne answers with schools and education options, public transport access, and walkability.

Geilston Bay suits investors and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Lindisfarne is the stronger match for families and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons