Gibson vs Monjingup, WA Suburb Comparison

Gibson for retirees and value; Monjingup for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GibsonMonjingup

Overall score

Gibson

29.6/100

Monjingup

33.0/100

Crime rate

Gibson

138.6 / 1k

Monjingup

138.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gibson

2

Monjingup

3

Population

Gibson

406

Monjingup

394

Metric leadGibson 3Monjingup 52 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGibsonMonjingup
Overall score29.6/10033.0/100
Housing (desirability)19.1/10030.4/100
Crime rate138.6 / 1k138.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1—
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves13
Public transport stops2—
Walkability3.0/1000.0/100
Nearby amenities23
Green cover5.7%0.6%
Population406394
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/106/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gibson is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Monjingup is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Gibson pulls ahead on housing affordability, walkability, and overall desirability, whereas Monjingup is the better pick for parks and reserves, nearby cafés and amenities, and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Gibson generally means more mid-market housing value, while Monjingup leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

On balance, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Gibson, while Monjingup remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons