Gillen vs Ilparpa, NT Suburb Comparison

Gillen for retirees and families; Ilparpa for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GillenIlparpa

Overall score

Gillen

45.7/100

Ilparpa

37.5/100

Nearby amenities

Gillen

77

Ilparpa

1

Population

Gillen

4,466

Ilparpa

542

Metric leadGillen 6Ilparpa 21 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGillenIlparpa
Overall score45.7/10037.5/100
Housing (desirability)39.6/10040.3/100
Schools & preschools7—
Weather (desirability)1.6/1001.6/100
Parks & reserves5—
Public transport stops123
Walkability43.0/1004.5/100
Nearby amenities771
Green cover7.5%0.0%
Population4,466542
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)6/108/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Gillen is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience, and Ilparpa is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

On the data, Gillen is stronger for public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Ilparpa answers with housing affordability and stronger socioeconomic advantage. Gillen generally means more mid-market housing value, while Ilparpa leans toward housing toward the upper end of the market.

Families and households prioritising schools may find Gillen the better fit, while investors are more likely to prefer Ilparpa.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons