Overall score
Gladesville
57.9/100
Ryde
65.0/100
Gladesville vs Ryde, NSW Suburb Comparison
Gladesville for investment; Ryde for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GladesvilleRyde
Crime rate
Gladesville
40.2 / 1k
Ryde
35.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Gladesville
233
Ryde
622
Population
Gladesville
12,867
Ryde
31,907
Metric leadGladesville 2Ryde 92 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesRyde
- Best for familiesRyde
- Best for investmentGladesville
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Gladesville | Ryde |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 57.9/100 | 65.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 55.2/100 | 49.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 40.2 / 1k | 35.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 12 | 14 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 8 | 32 |
| Public transport stops | 107 | 257 |
| Walkability | 83.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 233 | 622 |
| Planning activity | 55 | 67 |
| Green cover | 3.9% | 12.3% |
| Population | 12,867 | 31,907 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Gladesville is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Ryde is a well-serviced metro larger suburb with plenty happening nearby. Gladesville sits closer to the city centre, whereas Ryde is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Gladesville is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Ryde answers with a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.
Choose Gladesville if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Ryde for families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.