Overall score
Glebe
65.3/100
Surry Hills
62.0/100
Glebe for families and investment; Surry Hills for retirees.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glebe
65.3/100
Surry Hills
62.0/100
Crime rate
Glebe
141.9 / 1k
Surry Hills
208.3 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glebe
497
Surry Hills
707
Population
Glebe
11,680
Surry Hills
15,828
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glebe | Surry Hills |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 65.3/100 | 62.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 6.0/100 | 5.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 141.9 / 1k | 208.3 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 24 | 28 |
| Parks & reserves | 19 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 65 | 65 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 497 | 707 |
| Planning activity | 41 | 99 |
| Population | 11,680 | 15,828 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Glebe reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Surry Hills is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Surry Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Glebe keeps a flatter suburban layout.
Glebe pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Surry Hills is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities and a larger local community.
Families and investors may find Glebe the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Surry Hills.