Glebe vs Surry Hills, NSW suburb comparison

Glebe for families and investment; Surry Hills for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GlebeSurry Hills

Overall score

Glebe

65.3/100

Surry Hills

62.0/100

Crime rate

Glebe

141.9 / 1k

Surry Hills

208.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glebe

497

Surry Hills

707

Population

Glebe

11,680

Surry Hills

15,828

Metric leadGlebe 5Surry Hills 33 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlebeSurry Hills
Overall score65.3/10062.0/100
Housing (desirability)6.0/1005.9/100
Crime rate141.9 / 1k208.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools2428
Parks & reserves1915
Public transport stops6565
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities497707
Planning activity4199
Population11,68015,828
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Glebe reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Surry Hills is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Surry Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Glebe keeps a flatter suburban layout.

Glebe pulls ahead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, whereas Surry Hills is the better pick for nearby cafés and amenities and a larger local community.

Families and investors may find Glebe the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Surry Hills.

Related comparisons