Forest Lodge vs Surry Hills, NSW suburb comparison

Forest Lodge for families and investment; Surry Hills for value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Forest LodgeSurry Hills

Overall score

Forest Lodge

51.1/100

Surry Hills

62.0/100

Crime rate

Forest Lodge

141.8 / 1k

Surry Hills

208.3 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forest Lodge

149

Surry Hills

707

Population

Forest Lodge

4,965

Surry Hills

15,828

Metric leadForest Lodge 3Surry Hills 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForest LodgeSurry Hills
Overall score51.1/10062.0/100
Housing (desirability)7.6/1005.9/100
Crime rate141.8 / 1k208.3 / 1k
Schools & preschools2328
Parks & reserves915
Public transport stops2465
Walkability79.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities149707
Planning activity2299
Population4,96515,828
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Forest Lodge is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Surry Hills is a leafier hillside established suburb with elevated outlooks. Surry Hills sits among greener hillside streets, while Forest Lodge keeps a flatter suburban layout.

On the data, Forest Lodge is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Surry Hills answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.

Choose Forest Lodge if you are weighing investors; lean toward Surry Hills for families and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons