Forest Lodge vs Redfern, NSW Suburb Comparison

Forest Lodge for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Forest LodgeRedfern

Overall score

Forest Lodge

52.9/100

Redfern

54.4/100

Crime rate

Forest Lodge

141.8 / 1k

Redfern

235.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Forest Lodge

166

Redfern

493

Population

Forest Lodge

4,965

Redfern

13,072

Metric leadForest Lodge 5Redfern 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryForest LodgeRedfern
Overall score52.9/10054.4/100
Housing (desirability)51.3/10050.5/100
Crime rate141.8 / 1k235.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools2322
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves916
Public transport stops2473
Walkability79.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities166493
Planning activity2761
Green cover13.1%6.5%
Population4,96513,072
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Forest Lodge is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Redfern is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Forest Lodge is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Redfern answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees, families, and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Redfern, while Forest Lodge remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons