Overall score
Erskineville
59.5/100
Redfern
69.7/100
Redfern for families and investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Erskineville
59.5/100
Redfern
69.7/100
Crime rate
Erskineville
43.1 / 1k
Redfern
235.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Erskineville
178
Redfern
465
Population
Erskineville
9,657
Redfern
13,072
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Erskineville | Redfern |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 59.5/100 | 69.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 18.4/100 | 10.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 43.1 / 1k | 235.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 19 | 22 |
| Parks & reserves | 10 | 16 |
| Public transport stops | 38 | 73 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 178 | 465 |
| Planning activity | 36 | 49 |
| Population | 9,657 | 13,072 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Erskineville is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Redfern is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.
Erskineville tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Redfern stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access.
On balance, investors are more likely to prefer Redfern, while Erskineville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.