Erskineville vs Redfern, NSW suburb comparison

Redfern for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ErskinevilleRedfern

Overall score

Erskineville

59.5/100

Redfern

69.7/100

Crime rate

Erskineville

43.1 / 1k

Redfern

235.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Erskineville

178

Redfern

465

Population

Erskineville

9,657

Redfern

13,072

Metric leadErskineville 3Redfern 62 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryErskinevilleRedfern
Overall score59.5/10069.7/100
Housing (desirability)18.4/10010.1/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k235.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1922
Parks & reserves1016
Public transport stops3873
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities178465
Planning activity3649
Population9,65713,072
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Erskineville is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Redfern is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Erskineville tends to lead on housing affordability and a quieter safety profile, while Redfern stands out for parks and reserves and public transport access.

On balance, investors are more likely to prefer Redfern, while Erskineville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons