Erskineville vs Redfern, NSW Suburb Comparison

Erskineville for retirees and families; Redfern for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ErskinevilleRedfern

Overall score

Erskineville

59.2/100

Redfern

54.4/100

Crime rate

Erskineville

43.1 / 1k

Redfern

235.6 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Erskineville

209

Redfern

493

Population

Erskineville

9,657

Redfern

13,072

Metric leadErskineville 4Redfern 63 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryErskinevilleRedfern
Overall score59.2/10054.4/100
Housing (desirability)55.5/10050.5/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k235.6 / 1k
Schools & preschools1922
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1016
Public transport stops3873
Walkability100.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities209493
Planning activity5361
Green cover4.9%6.5%
Population9,65713,072
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Erskineville is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Redfern is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Erskineville tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and a calmer planning outlook, while Redfern stands out for schools and education options, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Redfern, while Erskineville remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons