Chippendale vs Erskineville, NSW suburb comparison

Chippendale for families and schools; Erskineville for retirees and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChippendaleErskineville

Overall score

Chippendale

58.2/100

Erskineville

59.5/100

Crime rate

Chippendale

73.8 / 1k

Erskineville

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chippendale

533

Erskineville

178

Population

Chippendale

7,803

Erskineville

9,657

Metric leadChippendale 3Erskineville 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChippendaleErskineville
Overall score58.2/10059.5/100
Housing (desirability)4.4/10018.4/100
Crime rate73.8 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools2919
Parks & reserves510
Public transport stops1238
Walkability88.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities533178
Planning activity1637
Population7,8039,657
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chippendale reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Erskineville is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Chippendale is stronger for nearby cafés and amenities and a calmer planning outlook; Erskineville answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Choose Chippendale if you are weighing households prioritising schools; lean toward Erskineville for retirees and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons