Chippendale vs Erskineville, NSW Suburb Comparison

Chippendale for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChippendaleErskineville

Overall score

Chippendale

56.8/100

Erskineville

59.2/100

Crime rate

Chippendale

73.8 / 1k

Erskineville

43.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chippendale

550

Erskineville

209

Population

Chippendale

7,803

Erskineville

9,657

Metric leadChippendale 3Erskineville 82 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChippendaleErskineville
Overall score56.8/10059.2/100
Housing (desirability)48.5/10055.5/100
Crime rate73.8 / 1k43.1 / 1k
Schools & preschools2919
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves510
Public transport stops1238
Walkability88.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities550209
Planning activity2353
Green cover2.2%4.9%
Population7,8039,657
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chippendale reads as an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap; Erskineville is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Chippendale is stronger for schools and education options, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook; Erskineville answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves.

Choose Chippendale if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Erskineville for retirees and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons