Chippendale vs Sydney, NSW Suburb Comparison

Chippendale for investment; Sydney for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChippendaleSydney

Overall score

Chippendale

56.8/100

Sydney

58.3/100

Crime rate

Chippendale

73.8 / 1k

Sydney

450.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chippendale

550

Sydney

4,123

Population

Chippendale

7,803

Sydney

16,667

Metric leadChippendale 4Sydney 72 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChippendaleSydney
Overall score56.8/10058.3/100
Housing (desirability)48.5/10047.0/100
Crime rate73.8 / 1k450.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools2920
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves516
Public transport stops12343
Walkability88.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities5504,123
Planning activity23358
Green cover2.2%14.2%
Population7,80316,667
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chippendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Sydney is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Chippendale pulls ahead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options, whereas Sydney is the better pick for parks and reserves, public transport access, and walkability.

On balance, retirees are more likely to prefer Sydney, while Chippendale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons