Overall score
Chippendale
56.8/100
Pyrmont
58.6/100
Pyrmont for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Chippendale
56.8/100
Pyrmont
58.6/100
Crime rate
Chippendale
73.8 / 1k
Pyrmont
90.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chippendale
550
Pyrmont
646
Population
Chippendale
7,803
Pyrmont
12,658
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chippendale | Pyrmont |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 56.8/100 | 58.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.5/100 | 49.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 73.8 / 1k | 90.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 29 | 23 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 47 |
| Walkability | 88.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 550 | 646 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 25 |
| Green cover | 2.2% | 10.0% |
| Population | 7,803 | 12,658 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Chippendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Pyrmont is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Chippendale is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Pyrmont answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.
On balance, retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Pyrmont, while Chippendale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.