Overall score
Chippendale
58.2/100
Pyrmont
65.2/100
Chippendale vs Pyrmont, NSW suburb comparison
Pyrmont for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ChippendalePyrmont
Crime rate
Chippendale
73.8 / 1k
Pyrmont
90.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Chippendale
533
Pyrmont
625
Population
Chippendale
7,803
Pyrmont
12,658
Metric leadChippendale 3Pyrmont 71 tiedacross 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Chippendale | Pyrmont |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.2/100 | 65.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 4.4/100 | 6.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 73.8 / 1k | 90.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 29 | 23 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 15 |
| Public transport stops | 12 | 47 |
| Walkability | 88.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 533 | 625 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 21 |
| Population | 7,803 | 12,658 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Chippendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Pyrmont is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Chippendale is stronger for a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook; Pyrmont answers with housing affordability and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Pyrmont, while Chippendale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.