Chippendale vs Pyrmont, NSW Suburb Comparison

Pyrmont for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ChippendalePyrmont

Overall score

Chippendale

56.8/100

Pyrmont

58.6/100

Crime rate

Chippendale

73.8 / 1k

Pyrmont

90.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Chippendale

550

Pyrmont

646

Population

Chippendale

7,803

Pyrmont

12,658

Metric leadChippendale 3Pyrmont 82 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryChippendalePyrmont
Overall score56.8/10058.6/100
Housing (desirability)48.5/10049.5/100
Crime rate73.8 / 1k90.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools2923
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves515
Public transport stops1247
Walkability88.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities550646
Planning activity2325
Green cover2.2%10.0%
Population7,80312,658
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Chippendale is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Pyrmont is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Chippendale is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook; Pyrmont answers with housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

On balance, retirees and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Pyrmont, while Chippendale remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons