Erskineville vs Forest Lodge, NSW Suburb Comparison

Erskineville for retirees and value; Forest Lodge for families and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ErskinevilleForest Lodge

Overall score

Erskineville

59.2/100

Forest Lodge

52.9/100

Crime rate

Erskineville

43.1 / 1k

Forest Lodge

141.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Erskineville

209

Forest Lodge

166

Population

Erskineville

9,657

Forest Lodge

4,965

Metric leadErskineville 8Forest Lodge 32 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryErskinevilleForest Lodge
Overall score59.2/10052.9/100
Housing (desirability)55.5/10051.3/100
Crime rate43.1 / 1k141.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools1923
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves109
Public transport stops3824
Walkability100.0/10079.0/100
Nearby amenities209166
Planning activity5327
Green cover4.9%13.1%
Population9,6574,965
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Erskineville is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Forest Lodge is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Erskineville tends to lead on housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and parks and reserves, while Forest Lodge stands out for schools and education options, plus a calmer planning outlook.

Choose Erskineville if you are weighing retirees and value-focused buyers; lean toward Forest Lodge for families, investors, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons