Overall score
Glen Oak
48.6/100
Seaham
42.2/100
Glen Oak for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glen Oak
48.6/100
Seaham
42.2/100
Crime rate
Glen Oak
96.2 / 1k
Seaham
105.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glen Oak
3
Seaham
1
Population
Glen Oak
426
Seaham
1,011
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glen Oak | Seaham |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 48.6/100 | 42.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 40.7/100 | 50.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 96.2 / 1k | 105.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | — | 1 |
| Weather (desirability) | 60.5/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 13 | 25 |
| Walkability | 19.5/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 3 | 1 |
| Planning activity | 4 | 10 |
| Green cover | 10.1% | 7.4% |
| Population | 426 | 1,011 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Glen Oak is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Seaham is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.
Glen Oak tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook, while Seaham stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.
On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Seaham, while Glen Oak remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.