Glen Oak vs Seaham, NSW Suburb Comparison

Glen Oak for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Glen OakSeaham

Overall score

Glen Oak

48.6/100

Seaham

42.2/100

Crime rate

Glen Oak

96.2 / 1k

Seaham

105.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Glen Oak

3

Seaham

1

Population

Glen Oak

426

Seaham

1,011

Metric leadGlen Oak 5Seaham 42 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGlen OakSeaham
Overall score48.6/10042.2/100
Housing (desirability)40.7/10050.8/100
Crime rate96.2 / 1k105.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools—1
Weather (desirability)60.5/10060.5/100
Parks & reserves—1
Public transport stops1325
Walkability19.5/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities31
Planning activity410
Green cover10.1%7.4%
Population4261,011
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Glen Oak is a quieter smaller community with space and a country-town pace, and Seaham is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe.

Glen Oak tends to lead on a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook, while Seaham stands out for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Seaham, while Glen Oak remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons