Glenfield vs Waggrakine, WA suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Glenfield | Waggrakine |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 36.7/100 | 37.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.5/100 | 64.3/100 |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 18 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 27.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 0 |
| Population | 1,009 | 2,679 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 2/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Glenfield reads as a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Waggrakine is a quieter mid-sized suburb with space and a country-town pace. Glenfield leans into coastal living, while Waggrakine feels more inland and suburban in character.
Glenfield pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Waggrakine is the better pick for housing affordability and public transport access. Glenfield generally means more sought-after housing, while Waggrakine leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Glenfield, while Waggrakine remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.