Overall score
Glenfield
35.9/100
Waggrakine
36.8/100
Glenfield for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glenfield
35.9/100
Waggrakine
36.8/100
Crime rate
Glenfield
6462.9 / 1k
Waggrakine
2431.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glenfield
1
Waggrakine
0
Population
Glenfield
1,009
Waggrakine
2,679
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glenfield | Waggrakine |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 35.9/100 | 36.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 63.5/100 | 64.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 6462.9 / 1k | 2431.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 1 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 1 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 18 |
| Walkability | 24.0/100 | 27.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 1 | 0 |
| Population | 1,009 | 2,679 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 5/10 | 2/10 |
Glenfield reads as a coastal smaller community shaped by beach life and outdoor living; Waggrakine is a quieter mid-sized suburb with space and a country-town pace. Glenfield leans into coastal living, while Waggrakine feels more inland and suburban in character.
Glenfield pulls ahead on nearby cafés and amenities and stronger socioeconomic advantage, whereas Waggrakine is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile. Glenfield generally means more sought-after housing, while Waggrakine leans toward more approachable housing costs.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Glenfield, while Waggrakine remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.