Overall score
Glenwood
58.8/100
Kings Park
54.2/100
Glenwood for retirees; Kings Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Glenwood
58.8/100
Kings Park
54.2/100
Crime rate
Glenwood
22.0 / 1k
Kings Park
124.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glenwood
402
Kings Park
48
Population
Glenwood
15,829
Kings Park
3,476
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glenwood | Kings Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 58.8/100 | 54.2/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 29.5/100 | 51.6/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.0 / 1k | 124.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 10 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | — |
| Public transport stops | 127 | 46 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 42.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 402 | 48 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 20 |
| Population | 15,829 | 3,476 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Glenwood reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Kings Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Glenwood is stronger for a quieter safety profile and public transport access; Kings Park answers with housing affordability.
Retirees and families may find Glenwood the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kings Park.