Overall score
Kings Park
54.2/100
Quakers Hill
72.8/100
Kings Park vs Quakers Hill, NSW suburb comparison
Quakers Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kings ParkQuakers Hill
Crime rate
Kings Park
124.1 / 1k
Quakers Hill
25.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kings Park
48
Quakers Hill
210
Population
Kings Park
3,476
Quakers Hill
27,893
Metric leadKings Park 3Quakers Hill 7across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesQuakers Hill
- Best for familiesQuakers Hill
- Best for best valueQuakers Hill
- Best for best schoolsQuakers Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kings Park | Quakers Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.2/100 | 72.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.6/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 124.1 / 1k | 25.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 14 |
| Public transport stops | 46 | 254 |
| Walkability | 42.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 48 | 210 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 26 |
| Population | 3,476 | 27,893 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 9/10 |
Comparison summary
Kings Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Quakers Hill is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Kings Park tends to lead on housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook, while Quakers Hill stands out for a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Quakers Hill, while Kings Park remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.