Colebee vs Quakers Hill, NSW Suburb Comparison

Colebee for families and value; Quakers Hill for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ColebeeQuakers Hill

Overall score

Colebee

54.3/100

Quakers Hill

60.0/100

Crime rate

Colebee

42.7 / 1k

Quakers Hill

25.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Colebee

179

Quakers Hill

223

Population

Colebee

4,914

Quakers Hill

27,893

Metric leadColebee 3Quakers Hill 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryColebeeQuakers Hill
Overall score54.3/10060.0/100
Housing (desirability)38.4/10043.9/100
Crime rate42.7 / 1k25.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools48
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves514
Public transport stops28254
Walkability82.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities179223
Planning activity734
Green cover6.1%11.9%
Population4,91427,893
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Colebee is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, while Quakers Hill is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Colebee pulls ahead on housing affordability, walkability, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Quakers Hill is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

Colebee suits investors more clearly, whereas Quakers Hill is the stronger match for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons