Overall score
Quakers Hill
72.8/100
The Ponds
67.7/100
Quakers Hill vs The Ponds, NSW suburb comparison
Quakers Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Quakers HillThe Ponds
Crime rate
Quakers Hill
25.4 / 1k
The Ponds
11.9 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Quakers Hill
210
The Ponds
230
Population
Quakers Hill
27,893
The Ponds
16,315
Metric leadQuakers Hill 3The Ponds 8across 11 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesQuakers Hill
- Best for familiesQuakers Hill
- Best for investmentQuakers Hill
- Best for best schoolsQuakers Hill
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Quakers Hill | The Ponds |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 72.8/100 | 67.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.4/100 | 49.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 25.4 / 1k | 11.9 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 9 |
| Parks & reserves | 14 | 18 |
| Public transport stops | 254 | 84 |
| Walkability | 80.0/100 | 88.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 210 | 230 |
| Planning activity | 26 | 12 |
| Population | 27,893 | 16,315 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Quakers Hill reads as an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap; The Ponds is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Quakers Hill pulls ahead on schools and education options and public transport access, whereas The Ponds is the better pick for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Quakers Hill, while The Ponds remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.