Quakers Hill vs The Ponds, NSW Suburb Comparison

Quakers Hill for investment and value; The Ponds for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Quakers HillThe Ponds

Overall score

Quakers Hill

60.0/100

The Ponds

61.2/100

Crime rate

Quakers Hill

25.4 / 1k

The Ponds

11.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Quakers Hill

223

The Ponds

240

Population

Quakers Hill

27,893

The Ponds

16,315

Metric leadQuakers Hill 3The Ponds 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryQuakers HillThe Ponds
Overall score60.0/10061.2/100
Housing (desirability)43.9/10039.0/100
Crime rate25.4 / 1k11.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools89
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves1418
Public transport stops25484
Walkability80.0/10088.0/100
Nearby amenities223240
Planning activity3417
Green cover11.9%16.6%
Population27,89316,315
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/1010/10

Comparison summary

Quakers Hill reads as an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap; The Ponds is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

Quakers Hill pulls ahead on public transport access, overall desirability, and a larger local community, whereas The Ponds is the better pick for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

On balance, retirees, families, investors, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Quakers Hill, while The Ponds remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons