Acacia Gardens vs Quakers Hill, NSW suburb comparison

Acacia Gardens for retirees; Quakers Hill for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Acacia GardensQuakers Hill

Overall score

Acacia Gardens

43.4/100

Quakers Hill

72.8/100

Crime rate

Acacia Gardens

25.5 / 1k

Quakers Hill

25.4 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Acacia Gardens

21

Quakers Hill

210

Population

Acacia Gardens

3,668

Quakers Hill

27,893

Metric leadAcacia Gardens 2Quakers Hill 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAcacia GardensQuakers Hill
Overall score43.4/10072.8/100
Housing (desirability)21.4/10048.4/100
Crime rate25.5 / 1k25.4 / 1k
Schools & preschools88
Parks & reserves114
Public transport stops39254
Walkability30.0/10080.0/100
Nearby amenities21210
Planning activity526
Population3,66827,893
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/109/10

Comparison summary

Acacia Gardens reads as a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel; Quakers Hill is an energetic metro larger suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Acacia Gardens sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Quakers Hill is in a middle-ring position.

Acacia Gardens tends to lead on a calmer planning outlook and stronger socioeconomic advantage, while Quakers Hill stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.

Acacia Gardens suits retirees more clearly, whereas Quakers Hill is the stronger match for families and investors.

Related comparisons