Acacia Gardens vs Quakers Hill, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Acacia Gardens | Quakers Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.0/100 | 73.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 21.4/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.4 / 1k | 29.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 6 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 14 |
| Public transport stops | 39 | 254 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 80.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 21 | 210 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 20 |
| Population | 3,668 | 27,893 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 9/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesAcacia Gardens
- Best for familiesQuakers Hill
- Best for investmentQuakers Hill
- Best for best valueQuakers Hill
- Best for best schoolsQuakers Hill
Comparison summary
Acacia Gardens and Quakers Hill offer different strengths across official suburb data. Quakers Hill leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Quakers Hill; Housing (desirability) favours Quakers Hill; Schools & preschools favours Quakers Hill. Quick verdicts: Retirees → Acacia Gardens, Families → Quakers Hill, Investment → Quakers Hill, Best value → Quakers Hill.