Acacia Gardens vs Kings Langley, NSW suburb comparison

Acacia Gardens for retirees and families; Kings Langley for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Acacia GardensKings Langley

Overall score

Acacia Gardens

43.4/100

Kings Langley

58.9/100

Crime rate

Acacia Gardens

25.5 / 1k

Kings Langley

67.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Acacia Gardens

21

Kings Langley

90

Population

Acacia Gardens

3,668

Kings Langley

9,354

Metric leadAcacia Gardens 2Kings Langley 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAcacia GardensKings Langley
Overall score43.4/10058.9/100
Housing (desirability)21.4/10048.7/100
Crime rate25.5 / 1k67.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools89
Parks & reserves113
Public transport stops39111
Walkability30.0/10055.0/100
Nearby amenities2190
Planning activity522
Population3,6689,354
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Acacia Gardens is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, while Kings Langley is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Acacia Gardens sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Kings Langley is in a middle-ring position.

Acacia Gardens pulls ahead on a quieter safety profile and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Kings Langley is the better pick for housing affordability and parks and reserves.

Acacia Gardens suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Kings Langley is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons