Acacia Gardens vs Stanhope Gardens, NSW suburb comparison
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Acacia Gardens | Stanhope Gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 39.0/100 | 66.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 21.4/100 | 47.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 29.4 / 1k | 21.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 2 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 39 | 61 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 21 | 274 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 3 |
| Population | 3,668 | 9,349 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Quick verdicts
- Best for retireesAcacia Gardens
- Best for investmentStanhope Gardens
- Best for best valueStanhope Gardens
- Best for best schoolsStanhope Gardens
Comparison summary
Acacia Gardens and Stanhope Gardens offer different strengths across official suburb data. Stanhope Gardens leads on more comparison categories overall. Overall score favours Stanhope Gardens; Housing (desirability) favours Stanhope Gardens; Crime rate favours Stanhope Gardens. Quick verdicts: Retirees → Acacia Gardens, Investment → Stanhope Gardens, Best value → Stanhope Gardens, Best schools → Stanhope Gardens.