Overall score
Acacia Gardens
43.4/100
Stanhope Gardens
69.0/100
Acacia Gardens for retirees and families; Stanhope Gardens for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Acacia Gardens
43.4/100
Stanhope Gardens
69.0/100
Crime rate
Acacia Gardens
25.5 / 1k
Stanhope Gardens
22.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Acacia Gardens
21
Stanhope Gardens
274
Population
Acacia Gardens
3,668
Stanhope Gardens
9,349
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Acacia Gardens | Stanhope Gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 43.4/100 | 69.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 21.4/100 | 47.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 25.5 / 1k | 22.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 39 | 61 |
| Walkability | 30.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 21 | 274 |
| Planning activity | 5 | 4 |
| Population | 3,668 | 9,349 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Acacia Gardens is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, and Stanhope Gardens is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Acacia Gardens sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Stanhope Gardens is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Acacia Gardens is stronger for excellent public transport and an affluent, sought-after address; Stanhope Gardens answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.
Acacia Gardens suits retirees more clearly, whereas Stanhope Gardens is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.