Acacia Gardens vs Stanhope Gardens, NSW suburb comparison

Acacia Gardens for retirees and families; Stanhope Gardens for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Acacia GardensStanhope Gardens

Overall score

Acacia Gardens

43.4/100

Stanhope Gardens

69.0/100

Crime rate

Acacia Gardens

25.5 / 1k

Stanhope Gardens

22.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Acacia Gardens

21

Stanhope Gardens

274

Population

Acacia Gardens

3,668

Stanhope Gardens

9,349

Metric leadAcacia Gardens 1Stanhope Gardens 91 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAcacia GardensStanhope Gardens
Overall score43.4/10069.0/100
Housing (desirability)21.4/10047.3/100
Crime rate25.5 / 1k22.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools85
Parks & reserves16
Public transport stops3961
Walkability30.0/100100.0/100
Nearby amenities21274
Planning activity54
Population3,6689,349
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Acacia Gardens is a well-connected metro mid-sized suburb with a familiar suburban feel, and Stanhope Gardens is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Acacia Gardens sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Stanhope Gardens is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Acacia Gardens is stronger for excellent public transport and an affluent, sought-after address; Stanhope Gardens answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Acacia Gardens suits retirees more clearly, whereas Stanhope Gardens is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons