Acacia Gardens vs Lalor Park, NSW Suburb Comparison

Acacia Gardens for schools; Lalor Park for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Acacia GardensLalor Park

Overall score

Acacia Gardens

45.6/100

Lalor Park

43.0/100

Crime rate

Acacia Gardens

25.5 / 1k

Lalor Park

67.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Acacia Gardens

27

Lalor Park

125

Population

Acacia Gardens

3,668

Lalor Park

7,834

Metric leadAcacia Gardens 4Lalor Park 81 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAcacia GardensLalor Park
Overall score45.6/10043.0/100
Housing (desirability)11.7/10050.8/100
Crime rate25.5 / 1k67.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools814
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves110
Public transport stops3994
Walkability30.0/10032.0/100
Nearby amenities27125
Planning activity616
Green cover7.5%12.2%
Population3,6687,834
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/103/10

Comparison summary

Acacia Gardens reads as a sought-after metro mid-sized suburb where housing reflects strong local demand; Lalor Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby. Acacia Gardens sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Lalor Park is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Acacia Gardens is stronger for a quieter safety profile, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Lalor Park answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and parks and reserves.

Retirees, families, and households prioritising schools may find Acacia Gardens the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Lalor Park.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons