Overall score
Kings Park
54.2/100
Stanhope Gardens
69.0/100
Kings Park vs Stanhope Gardens, NSW suburb comparison
Kings Park for investment; Stanhope Gardens for retirees and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
Kings ParkStanhope Gardens
Crime rate
Kings Park
124.1 / 1k
Stanhope Gardens
22.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Kings Park
48
Stanhope Gardens
274
Population
Kings Park
3,476
Stanhope Gardens
9,349
Metric leadKings Park 2Stanhope Gardens 8across 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesStanhope Gardens
- Best for investmentKings Park
- Best for best valueStanhope Gardens
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Kings Park | Stanhope Gardens |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.2/100 | 69.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 51.6/100 | 47.3/100 |
| Crime rate | 124.1 / 1k | 22.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 6 |
| Public transport stops | 46 | 61 |
| Walkability | 42.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 48 | 274 |
| Planning activity | 20 | 4 |
| Population | 3,476 | 9,349 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Kings Park reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Stanhope Gardens is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
On the data, Kings Park is stronger for housing affordability; Stanhope Gardens answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Investors may find Kings Park the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Stanhope Gardens.