Overall score
Colebee
54.3/100
Glendenning
44.6/100
Colebee vs Glendenning, NSW Suburb Comparison
Colebee for retirees and families; Glendenning for investment.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
ColebeeGlendenning
Crime rate
Colebee
42.7 / 1k
Glendenning
42.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Colebee
179
Glendenning
76
Population
Colebee
4,914
Glendenning
5,196
Metric leadColebee 6Glendenning 61 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesColebee
- Best for familiesColebee
- Best for investmentGlendenning
- Best for best valueColebee
- Best for best schoolsColebee
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Colebee | Glendenning |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.3/100 | 44.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 38.4/100 | 39.5/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.7 / 1k | 42.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 4 | 13 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 5 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 28 | 51 |
| Walkability | 82.0/100 | 36.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 179 | 76 |
| Planning activity | 7 | 8 |
| Green cover | 6.1% | 20.2% |
| Population | 4,914 | 5,196 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 5/10 |
Comparison summary
Colebee reads as a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby; Glendenning is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap.
Colebee tends to lead on parks and reserves, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Glendenning stands out for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and public transport access.
Choose Colebee if you are weighing retirees; lean toward Glendenning for families and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.