Colebee vs Schofields, NSW Suburb Comparison

Colebee for retirees and families; Schofields for investment and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

ColebeeSchofields

Overall score

Colebee

54.3/100

Schofields

56.1/100

Crime rate

Colebee

42.7 / 1k

Schofields

24.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Colebee

179

Schofields

117

Population

Colebee

4,914

Schofields

15,213

Metric leadColebee 3Schofields 64 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryColebeeSchofields
Overall score54.3/10056.1/100
Housing (desirability)38.4/10042.9/100
Crime rate42.7 / 1k24.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools44
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves53
Public transport stops28123
Walkability82.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities179117
Planning activity732
Green cover6.1%7.5%
Population4,91415,213
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Colebee is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Schofields is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Colebee tends to lead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and nearby cafés and amenities, while Schofields stands out for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and overall desirability.

Choose Colebee if you are weighing investors and households prioritising schools; lean toward Schofields for retirees and families.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons