Schofields vs The Ponds, NSW suburb comparison

The Ponds for families and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

SchofieldsThe Ponds

Overall score

Schofields

60.9/100

The Ponds

67.7/100

Crime rate

Schofields

24.7 / 1k

The Ponds

11.9 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Schofields

110

The Ponds

230

Population

Schofields

15,213

The Ponds

16,315

Metric leadSchofields 2The Ponds 81 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategorySchofieldsThe Ponds
Overall score60.9/10067.7/100
Housing (desirability)51.1/10049.9/100
Crime rate24.7 / 1k11.9 / 1k
Schools & preschools49
Parks & reserves318
Public transport stops12384
Walkability82.0/10088.0/100
Nearby amenities110230
Planning activity2812
Population15,21316,315
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Schofields reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; The Ponds is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Schofields is stronger for housing affordability and public transport access; The Ponds answers with a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves.

On balance, families and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer The Ponds, while Schofields remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons