Riverstone vs Schofields, NSW suburb comparison

Riverstone for value; Schofields for retirees.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RiverstoneSchofields

Overall score

Riverstone

60.3/100

Schofields

60.9/100

Crime rate

Riverstone

39.7 / 1k

Schofields

24.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Riverstone

128

Schofields

110

Population

Riverstone

8,627

Schofields

15,213

Metric leadRiverstone 4Schofields 7across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRiverstoneSchofields
Overall score60.3/10060.9/100
Housing (desirability)58.7/10051.1/100
Crime rate39.7 / 1k24.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools84
Parks & reserves43
Public transport stops93123
Walkability67.0/10082.0/100
Nearby amenities128110
Planning activity5728
Population8,62715,213
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Riverstone is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby, and Schofields is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Riverstone is stronger for housing affordability and schools and education options; Schofields answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access.

Value-focused buyers may find Riverstone the better fit, while retirees are more likely to prefer Schofields.

Related comparisons