Overall score
Riverstone
47.4/100
Tallawong
47.8/100
Riverstone vs Tallawong, NSW Suburb Comparison
Riverstone for investment and value; Tallawong for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
RiverstoneTallawong
Crime rate
Riverstone
39.7 / 1k
Tallawong
24.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Riverstone
131
Tallawong
137
Population
Riverstone
8,627
Tallawong
6,570
Metric leadRiverstone 5Tallawong 62 tiedacross 13 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for investmentRiverstone
- Best for best valueRiverstone
- Best for best schoolsTallawong
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Riverstone | Tallawong |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 47.4/100 | 47.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 49.0/100 | 20.1/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.7 / 1k | 24.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 8 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 93 | 64 |
| Walkability | 67.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 131 | 137 |
| Planning activity | 62 | 20 |
| Green cover | 1.5% | 9.4% |
| Population | 8,627 | 6,570 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 7/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Riverstone reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Tallawong is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
Riverstone pulls ahead on housing affordability, parks and reserves, and public transport access, whereas Tallawong is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, nearby cafés and amenities, and a calmer planning outlook.
Choose Riverstone if you are weighing investors and value-focused buyers; lean toward Tallawong for retirees, families, and households prioritising schools.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.