Angus vs Riverstone, NSW suburb comparison

Angus for families and schools; Riverstone for retirees and investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AngusRiverstone

Overall score

Angus

38.6/100

Riverstone

60.3/100

Crime rate

Angus

40.3 / 1k

Riverstone

39.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Angus

6

Riverstone

128

Population

Angus

384

Riverstone

8,627

Metric leadAngus 1Riverstone 10across 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAngusRiverstone
Overall score38.6/10060.3/100
Housing (desirability)36.3/10058.7/100
Crime rate40.3 / 1k39.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools48
Parks & reserves14
Public transport stops1893
Walkability27.0/10067.0/100
Nearby amenities6128
Planning activity157
Population3848,627
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Angus is a practical metro smaller community with solid links to the wider city, and Riverstone is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Angus sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Riverstone is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Angus is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Riverstone answers with housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Riverstone, while Angus remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons