Angus vs Riverstone, NSW Suburb Comparison

Angus for retirees and families; Riverstone for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

AngusRiverstone

Overall score

Angus

43.2/100

Riverstone

47.4/100

Crime rate

Angus

40.3 / 1k

Riverstone

39.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Angus

12

Riverstone

131

Population

Angus

384

Riverstone

8,627

Metric leadAngus 2Riverstone 101 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryAngusRiverstone
Overall score43.2/10047.4/100
Housing (desirability)22.5/10049.0/100
Crime rate40.3 / 1k39.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools48
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves14
Public transport stops1893
Walkability27.0/10067.0/100
Nearby amenities12131
Planning activity162
Green cover25.5%1.5%
Population3848,627
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)4/107/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Angus is a metro smaller community with a gently premium housing feel and familiar suburban calm, and Riverstone is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby. Angus sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Riverstone is in a middle-ring position.

On the data, Angus is stronger for a calmer planning outlook; Riverstone answers with housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and schools and education options.

Angus suits families and households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Riverstone is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons