Riverstone vs Rouse Hill, NSW Suburb Comparison

Riverstone for investment and value; Rouse Hill for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

RiverstoneRouse Hill

Overall score

Riverstone

47.4/100

Rouse Hill

62.3/100

Crime rate

Riverstone

39.7 / 1k

Rouse Hill

22.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Riverstone

131

Rouse Hill

328

Population

Riverstone

8,627

Rouse Hill

11,349

Metric leadRiverstone 3Rouse Hill 91 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRiverstoneRouse Hill
Overall score47.4/10062.3/100
Housing (desirability)49.0/10031.2/100
Crime rate39.7 / 1k22.5 / 1k
Schools & preschools83
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves411
Public transport stops93241
Walkability67.0/10094.0/100
Nearby amenities131328
Planning activity6295
Green cover1.5%13.9%
Population8,62711,349
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)7/1010/10

Comparison summary

Riverstone reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Rouse Hill is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap.

Riverstone pulls ahead on housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook, whereas Rouse Hill is the better pick for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access.

Investors and value-focused buyers may find Riverstone the better fit, while retirees, families, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Rouse Hill.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons