Rouse Hill vs Tallawong, NSW suburb comparison

Rouse Hill for retirees and families; Tallawong for schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Rouse HillTallawong

Overall score

Rouse Hill

70.6/100

Tallawong

48.4/100

Crime rate

Rouse Hill

22.5 / 1k

Tallawong

24.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rouse Hill

318

Tallawong

131

Population

Rouse Hill

11,349

Tallawong

6,570

Metric leadRouse Hill 7Tallawong 31 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRouse HillTallawong
Overall score70.6/10048.4/100
Housing (desirability)24.9/10029.7/100
Crime rate22.5 / 1k24.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Parks & reserves113
Public transport stops24164
Walkability92.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities318131
Planning activity9018
Population11,3496,570
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Rouse Hill is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Tallawong is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Rouse Hill is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Tallawong answers with housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.

On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Rouse Hill, while Tallawong remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.

Related comparisons