Rouse Hill vs Tallawong, NSW Suburb Comparison

Rouse Hill for retirees and families; Tallawong for value and schools.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Rouse HillTallawong

Overall score

Rouse Hill

62.3/100

Tallawong

47.8/100

Crime rate

Rouse Hill

22.5 / 1k

Tallawong

24.8 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Rouse Hill

328

Tallawong

137

Population

Rouse Hill

11,349

Tallawong

6,570

Metric leadRouse Hill 9Tallawong 22 tiedacross 13 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryRouse HillTallawong
Overall score62.3/10047.8/100
Housing (desirability)31.2/10020.1/100
Crime rate22.5 / 1k24.8 / 1k
Schools & preschools38
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves113
Public transport stops24164
Walkability94.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities328137
Planning activity9520
Green cover13.9%9.4%
Population11,3496,570
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)10/1010/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Rouse Hill is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Tallawong is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.

On the data, Rouse Hill is stronger for a quieter safety profile, parks and reserves, and public transport access; Tallawong answers with housing affordability, schools and education options, and a calmer planning outlook.

Rouse Hill suits retirees, families, and value-focused buyers more clearly, whereas Tallawong is the stronger match for households prioritising schools.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons