Overall score
Rouse Hill
70.6/100
Tallawong
48.4/100
Rouse Hill for retirees and families; Tallawong for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Rouse Hill
70.6/100
Tallawong
48.4/100
Crime rate
Rouse Hill
22.5 / 1k
Tallawong
24.8 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Rouse Hill
318
Tallawong
131
Population
Rouse Hill
11,349
Tallawong
6,570
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Rouse Hill | Tallawong |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 70.6/100 | 48.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 24.9/100 | 29.7/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.5 / 1k | 24.8 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 11 | 3 |
| Public transport stops | 241 | 64 |
| Walkability | 92.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 318 | 131 |
| Planning activity | 90 | 18 |
| Population | 11,349 | 6,570 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Put side by side, Rouse Hill is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap, and Tallawong is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Rouse Hill is stronger for a quieter safety profile and parks and reserves; Tallawong answers with housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Rouse Hill, while Tallawong remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.