Overall score
Grantham Farm
41.1/100
Rouse Hill
70.6/100
Grantham Farm for investment; Rouse Hill for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Grantham Farm
41.1/100
Rouse Hill
70.6/100
Crime rate
Grantham Farm
39.7 / 1k
Rouse Hill
22.5 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Grantham Farm
29
Rouse Hill
318
Population
Grantham Farm
3,669
Rouse Hill
11,349
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Grantham Farm | Rouse Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 41.1/100 | 70.6/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 58.7/100 | 24.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 39.7 / 1k | 22.5 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 7 | 3 |
| Parks & reserves | — | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 34 | 241 |
| Walkability | 32.0/100 | 92.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 29 | 318 |
| Planning activity | 23 | 90 |
| Population | 3,669 | 11,349 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Grantham Farm reads as a practical metro mid-sized suburb with solid links to the wider city; Rouse Hill is an energetic metro established suburb where cafés and local life overlap. Grantham Farm sits further out with more breathing room, whereas Rouse Hill is in a middle-ring position.
On the data, Grantham Farm is stronger for housing affordability and a calmer planning outlook; Rouse Hill answers with a quieter safety profile and public transport access.
Investors may find Grantham Farm the better fit, while retirees and families are more likely to prefer Rouse Hill.