Overall score
Glenwood
53.7/100
Kings Park
43.3/100
Glenwood vs Kings Park, NSW Suburb Comparison
Glenwood for retirees and families; Kings Park for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GlenwoodKings Park
Crime rate
Glenwood
22.0 / 1k
Kings Park
124.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Glenwood
414
Kings Park
55
Population
Glenwood
15,829
Kings Park
3,476
Metric leadGlenwood 9Kings Park 21 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesGlenwood
- Best for familiesGlenwood
- Best for investmentKings Park
- Best for best valueKings Park
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Glenwood | Kings Park |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 53.7/100 | 43.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 19.6/100 | 55.8/100 |
| Crime rate | 22.0 / 1k | 124.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 10 |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 7 | — |
| Public transport stops | 127 | 46 |
| Walkability | 61.0/100 | 42.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 414 | 55 |
| Planning activity | 16 | 20 |
| Green cover | 11.5% | 0.1% |
| Population | 15,829 | 3,476 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 8/10 |
Comparison summary
Glenwood reads as a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby; Kings Park is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.
On the data, Glenwood is stronger for a quieter safety profile, public transport access, and walkability; Kings Park answers with housing affordability, plus schools and education options.
Retirees may find Glenwood the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Kings Park.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.