Overall score
Golden Point
64.4/100
Soldiers Hill
49.8/100
Golden Point for retirees and families; Soldiers Hill for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Golden Point
64.4/100
Soldiers Hill
49.8/100
Crime rate
Golden Point
—
Soldiers Hill
190.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Golden Point
216
Soldiers Hill
77
Population
Golden Point
2,217
Soldiers Hill
2,813
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Golden Point | Soldiers Hill |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.4/100 | 49.8/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.7/100 | 70.5/100 |
| Crime rate | — | 190.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 8 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 27 | 13 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 35.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 216 | 77 |
| Planning activity | 37 | 83 |
| Population | 2,217 | 2,813 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 7/10 |
Put side by side, Golden Point is a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace, and Soldiers Hill is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
Golden Point tends to lead on parks and reserves and public transport access, while Soldiers Hill stands out for housing affordability and schools and education options.
Retirees and families may find Golden Point the better fit, while investors and value-focused buyers are more likely to prefer Soldiers Hill.