Overall score
Golden Point
64.4/100
Redan
60.5/100
Golden Point for retirees and families; Redan for investment and value.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Golden Point
64.4/100
Redan
60.5/100
Crime rate
Golden Point
—
Redan
155.7 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Golden Point
216
Redan
152
Population
Golden Point
2,217
Redan
3,000
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Golden Point | Redan |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.4/100 | 60.5/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 48.7/100 | 71.5/100 |
| Crime rate | — | 155.7 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 6 | 11 |
| Parks & reserves | 3 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 27 | 26 |
| Walkability | 63.0/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 216 | 152 |
| Planning activity | 37 | 35 |
| Population | 2,217 | 3,000 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 4/10 | 1/10 |
Golden Point reads as a regional smaller community with local services and a more relaxed pace; Redan is a regional mid-sized suburb with local services and a more relaxed pace.
On the data, Golden Point is stronger for parks and reserves and public transport access; Redan answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. Golden Point generally means more mid-market housing value, while Redan leans toward more approachable housing costs.
Choose Golden Point if you are weighing retirees and families; lean toward Redan for investors and value-focused buyers.