Overall score
Goolwa
33.6/100
Goolwa North
32.4/100
Goolwa vs Goolwa North, SA Suburb Comparison
Goolwa for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GoolwaGoolwa North
Crime rate
Goolwa
42.0 / 1k
Goolwa North
11.1 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Goolwa
26
Goolwa North
5
Population
Goolwa
2,558
Goolwa North
1,307
Metric leadGoolwa 6Goolwa North 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Goolwa | Goolwa North |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 33.6/100 | 32.4/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 57.5/100 | 53.2/100 |
| Crime rate | 42.0 / 1k | 11.1 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 3 | — |
| Weather (desirability) | 82.3/100 | 82.3/100 |
| Public transport stops | 5 | — |
| Walkability | 7.5/100 | 0.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 26 | 5 |
| Planning activity | 128 | 35 |
| Green cover | 1.2% | 0.5% |
| Population | 2,558 | 1,307 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 1/10 | 2/10 |
Comparison summary
Goolwa is a hillside mid-sized suburb with greener streets and a quieter pace, while Goolwa North is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe. Goolwa sits among greener hillside streets, while Goolwa North keeps a flatter suburban layout.
On the data, Goolwa is stronger for housing affordability, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities; Goolwa North answers with a quieter safety profile, overall desirability, and a calmer planning outlook. On housing, Goolwa sits in a affordable band, compared with a expensive feel in Goolwa North.
Choose Goolwa if you are weighing investors, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Goolwa North for retirees and families.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.