Gordon vs Claremont Suburb Comparison (ACT vs TAS)

Gordon for retirees and families; Claremont for investment.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

GordonClaremont

Overall score

Gordon

51.6/100

Claremont

38.2/100

Crime rate

Gordon

7.8 / 1k

Claremont

79.0 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Gordon

78

Claremont

53

Population

Gordon

7,892

Claremont

8,397

Metric leadGordon 6Claremont 31 tiedacross 10 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Quick verdicts

Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryGordonClaremont
Overall score51.6/10038.2/100
Housing (desirability)61.3/10076.2/100
Crime rate7.8 / 1k79.0 / 1k
Schools & preschools51
Weather (desirability)82.3/10082.3/100
Parks & reserves5
Public transport stops71
Walkability57.0/10030.0/100
Nearby amenities7853
Planning activity2
Green cover2.7%3.4%
Population7,8928,397
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)9/102/10

Comparison summary

Gordon (ACT) is an energetic metro mid-sized suburb where cafés and local life overlap, while Claremont (TAS) is a well-serviced metro established suburb with plenty happening nearby.

On the data, Gordon is stronger for a quieter safety profile, schools and education options, and walkability; Claremont answers with a larger local community. Gordon generally means more sought-after housing, while Claremont leans toward more approachable housing costs.

Choose Gordon if you are weighing retirees, families, and households prioritising schools; lean toward Claremont for investors.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons

Gordon vs Claremont Suburb Comparison… | Suburb Guide