Overall score
Greenslopes
64.4/100
Woolloongabba
63.0/100
Greenslopes for retirees and families.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Overall score
Greenslopes
64.4/100
Woolloongabba
63.0/100
Crime rate
Greenslopes
65.1 / 1k
Woolloongabba
127.0 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Greenslopes
320
Woolloongabba
480
Population
Greenslopes
7,941
Woolloongabba
8,687
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Greenslopes | Woolloongabba |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 64.4/100 | 63.0/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 47.6/100 | 12.4/100 |
| Crime rate | 65.1 / 1k | 127.0 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 14 | 17 |
| Parks & reserves | 4 | 11 |
| Public transport stops | 35 | 48 |
| Walkability | 90.0/100 | 100.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 320 | 480 |
| Population | 7,941 | 8,687 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 10/10 | 10/10 |
Greenslopes is a lively metro mid-sized suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, while Woolloongabba is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by.
On the data, Greenslopes is stronger for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile; Woolloongabba answers with schools and education options and parks and reserves.
On balance, retirees and families are more likely to prefer Greenslopes, while Woolloongabba remains a solid alternative depending on what matters most day to day.