Overall score
Greenwood
54.1/100
Sorrento
49.3/100
Greenwood vs Sorrento, WA Suburb Comparison
Greenwood for families and investment; Sorrento for beach lifestyle.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
GreenwoodSorrento
Crime rate
Greenwood
34.4 / 1k
Sorrento
34.4 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Greenwood
117
Sorrento
109
Population
Greenwood
9,861
Sorrento
7,795
Metric leadGreenwood 8Sorrento 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Greenwood | Sorrento |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 54.1/100 | 49.3/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 65.5/100 | 49.9/100 |
| Crime rate | 34.4 / 1k | 34.4 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 10 | 8 |
| Weather (desirability) | 23.4/100 | 23.4/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 12 | 4 |
| Public transport stops | 48 | 58 |
| Walkability | 57.0/100 | 34.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 117 | 109 |
| Green cover | 9.8% | 5.1% |
| Population | 9,861 | 7,795 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 10/10 |
Comparison summary
Greenwood reads as a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by; Sorrento is a coastal mid-sized suburb with an easy, sea-led rhythm. Where Sorrento is shaped by the coast, Greenwood offers a more landlocked suburban rhythm.
Greenwood pulls ahead on schools and education options, parks and reserves, and walkability, whereas Sorrento is the better pick for housing affordability, public transport access, and stronger socioeconomic advantage.
Choose Greenwood if you are weighing families and households prioritising schools; lean toward Sorrento for retirees, people chasing a beach lifestyle, and investors.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.