Gungahlin vs Claremont suburb comparison (ACT vs TAS)
Which suburb suits you better?
Side-by-side comparison of 16 categories from official government and open data.
| Category | Gungahlin | Claremont |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 66.3/100 | 48.7/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 25.5/100 | 76.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 25.6 / 1k | — |
| Schools & preschools | 2 | 5 |
| Parks & reserves | 2 | 5 |
| Public transport stops | — | 71 |
| Walkability | 100.0/100 | 30.0/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 494 | 42 |
| Planning activity | 4 | — |
| Population | 8,586 | 8,397 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 9/10 | 2/10 |
Quick verdicts
Comparison summary
Across states, Gungahlin is a lively metro established suburb with dining and everyday convenience close by, whereas Claremont is a practical metro established suburb with approachable housing and suburban calm.
On the data, Gungahlin is stronger for walkability and nearby cafés and amenities; Claremont answers with housing affordability and schools and education options. On housing, Gungahlin sits in a expensive band, compared with a affordable feel in Claremont.
Gungahlin suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Claremont is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.