Hamilton Valley vs Lavington, NSW Suburb Comparison

Hamilton Valley for value and schools; Lavington for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Hamilton ValleyLavington

Overall score

Hamilton Valley

48.0/100

Lavington

44.6/100

Crime rate

Hamilton Valley

94.7 / 1k

Lavington

94.7 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hamilton Valley

6

Lavington

122

Population

Hamilton Valley

834

Lavington

13,073

Metric leadHamilton Valley 4Lavington 52 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHamilton ValleyLavington
Overall score48.0/10044.6/100
Housing (desirability)54.8/10071.5/100
Crime rate94.7 / 1k94.7 / 1k
Schools & preschools—6
Weather (desirability)23.4/10023.4/100
Parks & reserves—7
Public transport stops27310
Walkability30.0/10073.0/100
Nearby amenities6122
Planning activity1455
Green cover38.3%10.2%
Population83413,073
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/101/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hamilton Valley is a more rural smaller community that rewards people who want room to breathe, and Lavington is a regional established suburb that feels self-contained without feeling remote.

On the data, Hamilton Valley is stronger for housing affordability, a calmer planning outlook, and stronger socioeconomic advantage; Lavington answers with public transport access, walkability, and nearby cafés and amenities. On housing, Hamilton Valley sits in a approachable band, compared with a affordable feel in Lavington.

Retirees and investors may find Hamilton Valley the better fit, while families, value-focused buyers, and households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer Lavington.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons