Hampstead Gardens vs Oakden, SA suburb comparison

Hampstead Gardens for retirees and families; Oakden for investment and value.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Hampstead GardensOakden

Overall score

Hampstead Gardens

48.1/100

Oakden

48.4/100

Crime rate

Hampstead Gardens

46.7 / 1k

Oakden

40.1 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hampstead Gardens

47

Oakden

176

Population

Hampstead Gardens

1,535

Oakden

3,583

Metric leadHampstead Gardens 2Oakden 61 tiedacross 9 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHampstead GardensOakden
Overall score48.1/10048.4/100
Housing (desirability)31.6/10061.6/100
Crime rate46.7 / 1k40.1 / 1k
Public transport stops915
Walkability61.5/10024.5/100
Nearby amenities47176
Planning activity1724
Population1,5353,583
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hampstead Gardens is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Oakden is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Hampstead Gardens tends to lead on walkability and a calmer planning outlook, while Oakden stands out for housing affordability and a quieter safety profile.

Hampstead Gardens suits retirees and families more clearly, whereas Oakden is the stronger match for investors and value-focused buyers.

Related comparisons