Hampstead Gardens vs Oakden, SA Suburb Comparison

Hampstead Gardens for investment and schools; Oakden for retirees and families.

See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.

Head to head

Visual comparison

Hampstead GardensOakden

Overall score

Hampstead Gardens

47.4/100

Oakden

39.9/100

Crime rate

Hampstead Gardens

70.0 / 1k

Oakden

44.5 / 1k

Nearby amenities

Hampstead Gardens

49

Oakden

178

Population

Hampstead Gardens

1,535

Oakden

3,583

Metric leadHampstead Gardens 3Oakden 62 tiedacross 11 compared metrics

Livability profile

Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs

Audience fit

Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100

All metrics

Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.

Full comparison table

Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.

CategoryHampstead GardensOakden
Overall score47.4/10039.9/100
Housing (desirability)55.6/10071.2/100
Crime rate70.0 / 1k44.5 / 1k
Weather (desirability)37.3/10037.3/100
Public transport stops915
Walkability63.5/10024.5/100
Nearby amenities49178
Planning activity1926
Green cover2.1%8.2%
Population1,5353,583
SEIFA (IRSAD decile)5/105/10

Comparison summary

Put side by side, Hampstead Gardens is a lively metro smaller community with dining and everyday convenience close by, and Oakden is a well-serviced metro mid-sized suburb with plenty happening nearby.

Hampstead Gardens tends to lead on walkability and a calmer planning outlook, while Oakden stands out for housing affordability, a quieter safety profile, and public transport access.

Hampstead Gardens suits households prioritising schools more clearly, whereas Oakden is the stronger match for retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers.

Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.

Related comparisons