Overall score
Hannans
44.0/100
West Lamington
38.9/100
Hannans vs West Lamington, WA Suburb Comparison
Hannans for retirees and families; West Lamington for schools.
See which suburb leads on livability, safety, schools, and lifestyle.
Head to head
Visual comparison
HannansWest Lamington
Crime rate
Hannans
138.6 / 1k
West Lamington
138.6 / 1k
Nearby amenities
Hannans
47
West Lamington
15
Population
Hannans
2,410
West Lamington
1,373
Metric leadHannans 8West Lamington 22 tiedacross 12 compared metrics
Livability profile
Desirability pillars scored 0–100 vs comparable suburbs
Quick verdicts
Clearer edge on lifestyle fit (score gap ≥ 3)
- Best for retireesHannans
- Best for familiesHannans
- Best for best valueHannans
- Best for best schoolsWest Lamington
Audience fit
Who each suburb suits — composite scores out of 100
All metrics
Side-by-side scores for every compared metric.
Full comparison table
Exact figures for every metric — winner highlighted in bold.
| Category | Hannans | West Lamington |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 44.0/100 | 38.9/100 |
| Housing (desirability) | 44.9/100 | 40.0/100 |
| Crime rate | 138.6 / 1k | 138.6 / 1k |
| Schools & preschools | 1 | 3 |
| Weather (desirability) | 4.5/100 | 4.5/100 |
| Parks & reserves | 1 | 2 |
| Public transport stops | 16 | 9 |
| Walkability | 49.0/100 | 13.5/100 |
| Nearby amenities | 47 | 15 |
| Green cover | 51.8% | 15.5% |
| Population | 2,410 | 1,373 |
| SEIFA (IRSAD decile) | 8/10 | 6/10 |
Comparison summary
Hannans reads as a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience; West Lamington is a regional hub with its own identity and everyday convenience.
On the data, Hannans is stronger for housing affordability, public transport access, and walkability; West Lamington answers with schools and education options, plus parks and reserves.
Retirees, investors, and value-focused buyers may find Hannans the better fit, while households prioritising schools are more likely to prefer West Lamington.
Generated from the official metrics on this page. It can omit nuance or contain errors — check the tables and source notes before relying on it.